blog
Last updated: 2020-01-31

(Melanoma) What Are the Comparison Results of Keytruda vs. Yervoy?

S
Medical Supporter Team
Cross-border medical coordination and editorial review team
(Melanoma) What Are the Comparison Results of Keytruda vs. Yervoy?

(Melanoma) What Are the Comparison Results of Keytruda vs. Yervoy?

Medical Supporter — Information Notice

This article is a summary of international medical information and is not medical advice; it cannot replace the diagnosis or treatment plan of your attending physician. The medical technologies, drug information and clinical data presented here are compiled from public literature and official statements of major Japanese medical institutions; the applicability and outcome of any therapy vary with each patient and must be assessed individually by a qualified physician.

Any specific treatment plan must be assessed by a licensed physician in Japan
  • September 25, 2019
  • Read time: 2 minutes

On July 22, 2019, Caroline Robert published in The Lancet "Comparative efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibody Keytruda versus anti-CTLA-4 antibody Yervoy in melanoma patients in the KEYNOTE-006 Phase 3 clinical trial (5-year long-term follow-up analysis)."

The KEYNOTE-006 trial was a multinational, multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial using 1:1:1 randomization. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival; secondary endpoint was objective response rate.

  • Keytruda group (2-week cycle, Keytruda 10 mg/kg, N=279)
  • Keytruda group (3-week cycle, Keytruda 10 mg/kg, N=277)
  • Yervoy group (3-week cycle, Yervoy 3 mg/kg, N=278)

Results at a median follow-up of 57.7 months showed that the primary endpoint median progression-free survival was: Keytruda group 8.4 months / Yervoy group 3.4 months. The Keytruda group showed a 43% reduction in progression risk, with significant improvement and a hazard ratio of 0.57.

The other primary endpoint, median overall survival, was: Keytruda group 32.7 months / Yervoy group 15.9 months. The Keytruda group showed a 27% reduction in progression risk, with significant improvement and a hazard ratio of 0.73.

Regarding safety, the incidence of Grade 3–4 adverse events was: Keytruda group 17% (N=96) / Yervoy group 20% (N=50). Serious adverse event incidence was: Keytruda group 14% (N=75) / Yervoy group 18% (N=45). The most common Grade 3–4 adverse events included colitis (Keytruda 2% / Yervoy 6%), diarrhea (Keytruda 2% / Yervoy 3%), and fatigue (Keytruda <1% / Yervoy 1%).

Based on the KEYNOTE-006 trial's 5-year follow-up results, Caroline Robert concluded: In melanoma patients, anti-PD-1 antibody Keytruda monotherapy demonstrated significant improvement in 5-year progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival compared to Yervoy monotherapy.

[Important Note] Medical Supporter's translations of overseas clinical trial data and pharmaceutical information are not intended to encourage participation in clinical trials or use of new drugs. The translated information is for reference only and not intended as medication guidelines. Please discuss with healthcare professionals and refer to the original text below the article for accurate information.

Source: Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. (Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul 22. pii: S1470-2045(19)30388-2. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2.)

Medical Supporter was formerly certified as an international medical visa guarantor by Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (B-066).

Considering medical care in Japan? Need information and support?

We help you organize the information needed for medical travel to Japan, liaise with Japanese medical institutions, and arrange a second-opinion consultation.The first consultation is free; an advisor will help you clarify the next steps.

Fukuoka HQ: +81-92-984-3200
Formerly officially certified, No. B-066

Figure 1Figure 1

Figure 2Figure 2

Figure 3Figure 3

Figure 4Figure 4

Figure 5Figure 5

Related Cancer Information

Related Reading

IL-21 NK Cells Demonstrate Anti-Tumor Potential Against Glioblastoma

IL-21-expressing NK cells demonstrate sustained anti-tumor activity against glioblastoma stem cell-like cells (GSCs). Both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirm this effect, bringing new breakthroughs in glioblastoma treatment.

2026-03-17

AI Meets Cancer: Personalized Bladder Cancer Treatment

[The New Integration of AI and Bladder Cancer Treatment] AI technology and machine learning are making bladder cancer treatment more personalized, helping doctors predict patient responses to chemotherapy. By utilizing whole-slide tumor imaging and gene expression analysis, th...

2026-02-04

新生抗原是什麼?

之前我們寫了一篇關於日本免疫治療的趨勢後,有幾位跟我們聯繫,是否能夠更加詳盡的介紹樹突細胞。從免疫檢查哨抑制劑(Nivolumab等)的開發以及機制中能夠發現,CTL這種特殊的T淋巴球是相當重要的。因此藉由樹突細胞疫苗讓CTL增加,是對於癌症治療的方法之一。另外,單單的樹突細胞疫苗必須要認識癌細胞才能給予CTL指令,我

2026-08-19

聯合免疫療法有效縮小轉移性腸癌

【創新免疫療法縮小多種轉移性胃腸道癌症】全新形式的腫瘤浸潤淋巴細胞(TIL)療法在轉移性胃腸道癌症患者中顯示出顯著的治療效果,為癌症患者帶來新希望。這種個性化癌症免疫療法提升了腫瘤縮小率,未來有望應用於多種實體瘤的治療。

2025-11-14